“No one should wish for the collapse of Russia”


Press Respond to Wagner’s Uprising
“No one should wish for the collapse of Russia”

At the end of the week, mercenary leader Yevgeny Prigozhin marched towards Moscow with his Wagner fighters, but ended the armed uprising after just one day. Unanimously agreed in the international press that the clear loser is the head of the Kremlin, Vladimir Putin. But what does this mean for Ukraine and the world?

the The Telegraph (UK) He asks how safe it is to keep Russia’s nuclear weapons: “The immediate danger of Vladimir Putin has been averted, even if it is generally assumed that he is a weak Russian population, who has been told lies about invading Ukraine from the start.” Yet one must ask oneself how A heavily armed force could take over a city of more than a million people almost unmolested. And while President Putin’s anxiety is gratifying, no one should want Russia to collapse. When chaos reigns.” “What will happen” of Russia’s nuclear arsenal? At least during the Cold War, it was known to be under strong central control. Prigozhin’s rebellion shows that these weapons can fall into the hands of a group of mercenaries who seem able to traverse the country as They like it. Putin has repeatedly threatened to use nuclear weapons, a move few analysts take seriously. But do we know how safe the country’s stockpile is?”

the The Guardian (UK) He sees Putin’s power being permanently damaged: “On Saturday, the head of the Russian state drew parallels with the events of the 1917 war, which led to the“ destruction of the army and the state.” Others pointed to 1991: Mikhail Gorbachev managed to avoid a coup, but his government was not spared. Nor the Soviet Union for the rest of the year. Few would have predicted the same fate that would befall Putin. But never was his rule over the country more threatened than it is today. In the past eighteen months, he had suffered two great setbacks, both of their own cause: the failed attempt to take Kiev and subjugate Ukraine, and now his protégé is rebelling against the forces that Putin himself had strengthened. It is true that it will be finished, but the consequences of this are just beginning to appear.

The daily newspaper Liberation (France) Now he sees “a real reason” that makes Putin “paranoid”: “The whole world – for the first time in his long reign – looked at (Russian President) Vladimir Putin reeling. (…) This is not only the warnings of those whose intelligence services did not work, And also (…) that his forces failed in an invasion that was supposed to collapse in three days is no longer a secret. The humiliated Vladimir Putin has real reason to be paranoid. He knows that his enemies lurk in his territory as well. And since Prigozhin’s uprising, the world has reached out The entire family has come to the conclusion that he is no longer in control of them. The events of June 24 may be repeated. Clans, factions, or private armies….Which of their inner demons will march on Moscow next?”

the Corriere della Sera (Italy) The true effect of Prigozhin’s attempted march on Moscow, he explains, is not visible: “Moscow and its symbols are no longer attacked. Indeed, it seems they were not. Nothing was left of that dramatic day, some part of history seemed to be being written. State news returned to the usual reporting, The morning after the cooking shows. (…) The rest of Wagner’s march in Moscow cannot be seen with the naked eye, but you can feel it. In short, the uprising showed the weakness of Putin’s power system by striking at the core of his power. (…) tie Whoever ended the confrontation does not change the size of this wound.

the The Wall Street Journal (USA) He sees an opportune time for Ukraine and scolds the United States: “It looks like the time has come for Ukraine to speed up its summer offensive and take back more territory from the invaders. Had the United States provided more modern weapons sooner, Ukraine would have been in a better position to do so.” President (Joe) conferred Biden met with G7 leaders on Saturday and reiterated his unwavering support for Ukraine. That’s the right message, but the F-16s and other assets are weeks or more away from being deployed.”

The daily newspaper “Hospodarske noviny” (Czech Republic) He questions the role played by Belarusian ruler Alexander Lukashenko: “This is a huge loss of prestige for Russian President Putin — not only because a mercenary force was already on its way to Moscow. In the conflict, Belarusian President Lukashenko mediated a person who, in the eyes of ordinary Russians, was just a loyal vassal of the Kremlin.” When the Russian military will turn to Lukashenko with a request, for example, to negotiate a ceasefire in Ukraine or arrange for Putin’s peaceful departure from office, suddenly these considerations no longer sound like wishful thinking, but as something that can happen under certain circumstances.

Putin’s isolation is in his power apparatus de Volkskrant (Netherlands) He penned: “The implications for the war against Ukraine are still unclear. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Sunday that the uprising in Prigozhin proves that Putin has “no control” over Russia and that he is “clearly very afraid.” (…) Aside from Prigozhin, Putin does not appear to have lost any allies within his security services at the moment, with Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov saying on Sunday that the war against Ukraine continues unchanged, declining to comment on rumors of imminent layoffs within the military – called Prigozhin. To the departure of Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov. One can assume that Putin will intensify repression in Russia because he fears a repeat of Prigozhin’s revolution. He knows that revolutions in Russia sometimes only start with a second successful attempt, and that was the most important promise he made to the Russian people since 23 years: no revolution.

“The Standard” (Austria) He speculates about the return of the ghost: “What happens now? Wagner fighters are unlikely to submit to the regular army. They will sooner meet in Belarus under their chief Prigozhin. For what purpose. It is not inconceivable that Putin dismissed Defense Minister Shoigu and his chief of staff Gerasimov. It could be Hard-liners come to power. It would not be a good prospect for Ukraine. And for Putin, it was not a very popular decision, not even a year before the presidential election. It is likely that he will win the election, one there is no real heir. But what will happen after that? If Putin fails, civil war threatens in Russia. The specter looms of the chaos of the 1990s. Power struggles, political assassinations. But this time, with different private armies then the West is likely to accept that Putin desperately wishes they come back. So that nuclear weapons remain under control “.

tabloid “Verden Gang” (Norway) He commented, “The traces of that day could not be erased. Everyone could see that Putin was under tremendous pressure. The propaganda machine could no longer hide that Russia was divided and dissatisfaction with the war was high. Putin seemed more vulnerable than ever during his time as president.” “. And few things are more humiliating for an autocrat than to appear weak. He has been forced to acquit those he had accused of treason a few hours earlier. He has been forced to accept tacitly that Prigozhin was telling the truth to the Russians about the false justification for war.”


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *